redknight - ignore the twat

Works for me.

Just so long as you guys know we aren't stuck with people we collectively don't want to be.

Fine with me as well 

Actually I wanted to offer a small apology and a retraction.  The words twat and asshole in my original post were unnecessary.

However the word hypocrit is entirely appropriate.  Here is a quote from redknight

Goes to reason - you are a twat in both places - quietlife tries to be funny, but never really is, he comes off as a complete reject. Needless to say it won't take you long to do the same here now that people on AF have tired of your poor sense of humour.

I'm not in favour of a ban, but do believe we should temper our responses, and if it gets personal and nasty (and sorry, my post was just that), then banning has to be the last resort.

For those who don't know it quitelife on AF is our friend Warren

Works for me.

Just so long as you guys know we aren't stuck with people we collectively don't want to be.

I would rather he stayed then we can ignore or use as our plaything as we desire. I would suggest ignore.

Actually I wanted to offer a small apology and a retraction.  The words twat and asshole in my original post were unnecessary.

However the word hypocrit is entirely appropriate.  Here is a quote from redknight

Goes to reason - you are a twat in both places - quietlife tries to be funny, but never really is, he comes off as a complete reject. Needless to say it won't take you long to do the same here now that people on AF have tired of your poor sense of humour.

I'm not in favour of a ban, but do believe we should temper our responses, and if it gets personal and nasty (and sorry, my post was just that), then banning has to be the last resort.

Needless to say Warren (quietlife) does not come accross as anything of the sort.  His latest posts on AF hit the nail on the head.

Moreover, and particularly after Daves post, we can ban him.

Maybe that's the next evolution of our sin bin. Hit -15 (?) Karmas and you're out?

Can I suggest that we don't respond to his posts, at all.  Just do not acknowledge or respond to him in any way.

He's just a troll and the quickest way to get rid of the asshole (short of a ban) is to let him rant in SILENCE.

Got my vote.

hey george Im curious as to your problem with me. I thought this forum was meant to be a friendly place - you've certainly disrupted that flow by singling me out with a thread calling me a twat and asshole? Don't worry I'm not going to respond in the same kind as you.

 Is it that there are different standards expected depending on who the posters are. In any case I would like that to be clarified by the admin? If that's how the forum is to be run then that's the admins prerogative but I would just like to know what is acceptable behaviour and what is not. I find this thread serves no other purpose than to aggravate and provoke a response.

Can I suggest that we don't respond to his posts, at all.  Just do not acknowledge or respond to him in any way.

He's just a troll and the quickest way to get rid of the asshole (short of a ban) is to let him rant in SILENCE.